home

We have developed a DRAFT Evaluation Criteria list and are **seeking comment from Polytechnic staff and students by July 15th, 2011 - this deadline is for finalising the criteria, not the full evaluation!** @https://intranet.sharedservices.tas.edu.au/polytechnic/professional-learning/rd/Pages/LearningManagementSystemEvaluation2011.aspx
 * Invitation to Comment[[image:hairandbeauty:poly-logo-wiki_2.gif align="right"]]**
 * A Progress Update on the Evaluation process is available on Phoenix on**

The criteria are available in .doc format, and also are listed below

We'd like to know what is most important to you - perhaps let us know your 'top five' from the list, or add criteria we've missed. Emails can be sent to Kirsty Sharp, you can use the discussion tool on the wiki page (use the tab above), or you can simply stop a Resource Development team member in the corridor!
 * Providing Feedback on Criteria**

Resource Development Team Statewide Manager – Kirsty Sharp South – Anita Busch North – Jacquie Williams North West – Kate Hayes


 * **Learning** || # Ease of Use for students eg navigation, login, access on- and off-campus, assignment submission
 * 1) Rich text/ WYSIWYG editor for text entry
 * 2) Professional learning support available for teachers, support staff
 * 3) Guides for learners in using system available
 * 4) Track learner activity beyond quiz completion
 * 5) Flexible to variety of teaching and assessment strategies
 * 6) Collaborative learning eg student-student communication, shared construction/ building of knowledge
 * 7) Works with web conferencing tools, preferably integrated
 * 8) Supports lifelong access to learning, option to access pre/post active enrolment, eg eportfolio beyond the course
 * 9) Supports AQTF compliance, participation recording
 * 10) Potential for use in commercial courses ||
 * Technical || # Ease of Adoption/ Conversion including converting courses or starting a new course
 * 1) Administrative task completion eg add, enrol, end enrolment
 * 2) 3rd Party plugin, integration with external systems
 * 3) Integration or interaction with Student Management System possible
 * 4) Ease of Adaptation eg themes, stylesheets
 * 5) Meets accessibility, Meet full compliance with all W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Priority 1/Level A checkpoints (Tas state government minimum requirement), be accessible both on- and off-campus without significant bandwidth issues.
 * 6) Technical environment required, eg server infrastructure, firewall access, bandwidth ||
 * Other || # License and ongoing support costs
 * 1) Online enrolment and immediate commencement, self registration for students, inc partnerships and seamless transition
 * 2) Are there other VET Sector implementations, if not, why not? ||

Resource Development Team Statewide Manager – Kirsty Sharp South – Anita Busch North – Jacquie Williams North West – Kate Hayes